Unbloating Vista Could Be Security Risk

Thursday, January 31, 2008 by Mistlee



Top Security News

Mozilla Prepping Firefox Chrome Fix
Though Firefox users would only be vulnerable if a chrome package is flat, rather than contained in a jar, Mozilla plans a quick fix. Until Firefox 2.0.0.12...


HR Application Process May Endanger Companies
It does no good to tell people not to open email from untrusted sources, much less attachments, only to have one department do so all the time. Typical human resources requests of job applicants include...


Authentify Wants To Rock Out-of-Band Authentication
A second line of authentication could be all it takes to make a disappearing data tape with details on thousands of people worthless to whoever stole it. Some credit card and banking customers may be...


Second Life Economy, Banks Crushed
People who plugged real money into the online world Second Life and its virtual banks promising rich returns have been left holding the bag. ATMs in Second...


Master Boot Records Endangered Again
New rootkits have a familiar target - the master boot record, where they can hide from detection...




David A. Utter
Thursday:01.31.08

Unbloating Vista Could Be Security Risk

A frustrated Windows Vista user who turns to the vLite application to shrink the OS can pick and choose components to remove, including the Windows Firewall.

A 15GB operating system may have a little more on the component side than it truly needs to run efficiently. Lots of people feel this way about Vista, especially Dino Nuhagic.

He developed vLite, a utility that permits customization of the Vista OS before installing it on a system. "This method is much cleaner, not to mention easier and more logical than doing it after installation on every reinstall," Nuhagic said on the vLite site.

Doing this is not for the faint of heart when it comes to technology issues. Being able to remove a component doesn't mean one should. Someone who decides to trust a router for protection and removes the Windows Firewall from a laptop installation could be in for a nasty surprise when connecting to another network that may be lacking in security for whatever reason.

Try a Better Way Today. Try WebEx PCNow

The Windows Firewall arrived with Microsoft operating systems starting with XP. Before that, security pros and other prudent users had to add third party firewalls to Windows 2000 to safeguard against the OS attacks that were common for the period.

People may not realize this, but the shift from attacking Windows to attacking applications began when XP gained a place on thousands of PCs. Though people could add firewalls to their systems before this, many did not. XP arrived with the firewall on by default.

It may feel right to remove some of Vista's excess. Gamers in particular will be heartened by Nuhagic's comment in Computerworld about putting Vista on a drastic diet:

Nuhagic didn't come right out and say it, but he hinted that he -- like more critical users and pundits -- thought Vista was bloated and could use some reducing. "To be frank, I don't need 90% of Windows. But that 10%, which guarantees that you can run [the] majority of games out there, is what is worth isolating."

To the power gamers who have been frustrated with Vista, vLite may look like an absolute must-have for their systems. Achieving speed at the expense of security should not be part of the process. Plenty of criminals would love to grab a gamer's login credentials, and losing one's virtual identity would be worse than a headshot in-game.

About the Author:
David Utter is a business and technology writer for SecurityProNews and WebProNews.

SecurityProNews About Us News Archives Feedback

0 comments: